Motorcycle Investor mag Subscribe to our free email news
Mac the Valk take II (by Guy 'Guido' Allen, July 2022)
It’s
just as you’re straightening up, feeding in throttle and
enjoying the distinctive growl from the flat six that it
all comes flooding back. Two decades wash away as you
recall the last time you felt exactly like this, winding
up the Valkyrie Interstate for a run south towards home.
Who knew Honda built time machines? We’ve
successfully made the jump back to the very early 2000s,
when muggins owned the first Valkyrie Interstate – then
a new motorcycle (above). Or at least a low-mile demo
I’d bought from Honda. I think we had it about three to
four years, in which time it racked up at least
40,000km. So it had been well-used. (See a story from one trip, here.) When it
came time to sell, there was the inevitable remorse as
it was ridden down the driveway and out of sight by the
new owner. I’m no longer sure why it was offloaded –
probably to fund something
newer/faster/shinier/whatever. Over the intervening 20
years, I’d had plenty of time to think of Mac the Valk
and increasingly those thoughts led to an urge to find
another. Call it
buying back your youth, or fixing an earlier lapse of
judgement – take your pick – another example (nominally
2001) is now ensconced in the shed. For
those of you not quite up to speed on these monsters,
let’s do a quick recap. Honda’s first Valkyrie series (see our profile here) was a
rework of the 1500 Gold Wing. Very much an American
inspired design, it ran the familiar liquid-cooled SOHC
flat six powerplant, tuned somewhat differently with six
carburettors in place of the Wing’s two. Oddly
enough, the power claim was pretty much the same as for
the Gold Wing – about 100 horses, however that seems
modest since we’ve seen independent dyno charts
suggesting they can make close to mid-90s at the rear
wheel. Certainly the power delivery is more lively,
particularly when it comes to mid-range. There
were three variants: Standard, Touring (with panniers
and screen) and the Interstate you see here. It included
a more elaborate fairing, topbox, different seating, a
claimed tweak to the mid-range over the other two, and
an increase in fuel capacity from 20 to 26 litres. That
lot weighed a hefty 350 kilos, dry. While
100-ish horses may not seem like a lot these days, at
the time it was a big number for a full-dress cruiser.
Witness this impression from a contemporary
road test by the folk at Motorcycle.com in the USA:
“Anyone with
a bold throttle hand and callous disregard for speed
limits can take this motorcycle places where no touring
motorcycle belongs, with monstrous torque offering
fearless freeway acceleration and ample horsepower
creating the potential for triple digit straights,
should you be so reckless and irresponsible.” My own
recollections included a respect for the thing’s
straight line urge and, believe it or not, halfway
reasonable cornering ability. Now people give you a
strange look when you say that, but it’s true. It’s one
of those mind-over-matter situations, where if you grab
the thing by the tiller and plan ahead in corners, it
gets in and out quite respectably – certainly quicker
than a land yacht this size has a right to. The
brochures of the day led off with the line “give your
riding buddies performance anxiety” and, if they too
were on cruisers, there was a lot of truth to that.
However any halfway competent rider on a reasonable 600
street bike would leave you for dead. With all
that in mind, it was interesting climbing back into the
saddle after all that time. My ‘new’ example is a 2001
model with 80,000km on the odo, in great overall shape
and cost Au$11,000 (US$7500,
GB£6300).
That compares to Au$26,990 (US$18,500, GB£15,500) plus
on-road costs two decades ago. Back
when
it was new, Honda dealers had trouble shifting them off
the floor. This example wasn’t sold until 2003.
Although, weirdly, the moment they finished, there
seemed to be some demand and used units were getting
good money. Oh the joys of being a dealer… The
engine
is addictive, thanks to its willing nature and unique
sound. Finding the five available gears is accurate, but
it prefers a slow change from first to second if you
want it to happen quietly. The sheer weight of the thing
means any shaft reaction is minimal, while torque
reaction from the engine is non-existent. It
loves
fuel. Somehow that aspect of its behavior had been wiped
from the memory. In normal circumstances it will manage
around 11km/lt but expect to see that plummet if you go
all Valentino Rossi on the throttle. Maintenance
is
surprisingly straight-forward. Valve lash is due around
every 20,000km and is by screw and locknut. The big item
is the cam belt, which cautious owners change over at
100,000km. Access is easy. Overall, these engines have a
reputation for enduring huge distances. Braking
and
suspension belong to another era. Adjustment on the
latter is rear preload only and in this case the whole
set-up feels like it could do with a freshen-up. It’s
okay, but the term ‘finesse‘ doesn’t spring to mind. Like
a lot
of very big bikes of the era, it has its own personality
when being hustled along on a tight road. Think
over-exuberant Labrador if you’re really pressing on,
sometimes wanting to run wide, wagging its tail and
putting on a bit of a show. It’s all quite benign and
hugely entertaining. Meanwhile
the
brakes are two-piston calipers up front, used across a
lot of Honda models at the time. They’re okay, but power
is lacking and you really do need to lean on the rear to
help out – not surprising given the weight distribution.
ABS?
Err,
nope. Ditto for any other electronic safety nets.
Welcome (back) to analogue riding. One
upgrade
is the aftermarket cruise control. Coincidentally I had
the same system on my previous Valk and it was a godsend
for long trips. It’s essentially an adaption of an
aftermarket car unit, using a vacuum system to control
the throttle linkages tied to electronics that read road
speed, with cut-out switches on the brakes and clutch. Meanwhile
we
have a sound system that really is a throwback. It has
an AM/FM radio receiver, is wired for intercom (Honda
offered helmet headsets) and is set up to accept a CB
transmitter. Complete with a folding aerial, it’s a
relic of times past in these days of digital players and
Bluetooth. When
it
comes to luggage, it runs a giant topbox that will
accept a couple of full-face helmets, with helmet locks
underneath for those days when it’s already packed with
gear. Plus there is a pair of top-loading panniers. Overall
comfort is good. I’ll admit to being pleased to see a
set of sheepskin covers on the thrones, as they make a
difference over a distance. Previously I found the seats
okay but not brilliant. The addition of the hollowed-out
ruminants is worthwhile, even if they look suspiciously
like something you’d see in a Camry at the local lawn
bowls club. As before,
at 188cm in height (6’2”), I found the stock windscreen
a touch low – just at a height where the wind buffets
your helmet. I’m applying exactly the same fix as last
time, which is a taller and wider screen from
Slipstreamer (formerly Tulsa) in the USA. Hopefully that
will turn up soon. Now I’ll admit to being spoiled over recent months with on-board heating. For example, our recently-acquired BMW K1200LT (above – a similar age to the Valk) has heated seats and handgrips, which are a big winner when things turn icy. Add in a full fairing, and it’s a firm favourite as a Winter tourer. That, in a roundabout way, slots the Valkyrie in as our Summer tourer. Ridiculous…over the top? Maybe, but the two together (including some imminent repairs on the BMW) owe me around $23k, or about half the price of a new K 1600 GT or Gold Wing. And before
you ask, we have an adventure tourer as well, a BMW
R1150GS in (above) good running shape that owes us about
$6k. That fits in as a jump-on-and-go all-rounder. As others
have observed, more often than not motorcycling is about
the ride rather than the machinery. In this case I think
it’s a bit of both. Mac the Valk II is a long way from
having the tech of a current model, though it covers a
lot of the important bases at a fraction of the cost. In addition,
it has an abundance of character, is quick enough to be
interesting and, if the first ride of 750km is any
indication, will fit nicely into the current fleet as a
big lazy Summer mount. So far, it
looks like a good decision.
RATINGS GOOD Loads of
character Tough engine
that sounds good Build
quality is high NOT SO
GOOD Very heavy Loves its
fuel SPECS ENGINE
TRANSMISSION
CHASSIS
& RUNNING GEAR
DIMENSIONS
& CAPACITIES WHEELS
&
TYRES PERFORMANCE
CLAIMS OTHER
STUFF
------------------------------------------------- Produced by AllMoto abn 61 400 694 722 |
ArchivesContact
|